Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2015 13:23:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by mastertech on Apr 3, 2015 15:27:04 GMT -5
I looked over both prints and I do not see any differences, even in parts value.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2015 17:19:30 GMT -5
I looked over both prints and I do not see any differences, even in parts value. Yes I could find nothing too. Strange. |
|
|
|
Post by gjaky on Apr 6, 2015 7:56:03 GMT -5
The notch on the PWB is different, so you can't put 9" neckboard on 8" tube unles you cut the plastic off the tube socket, you can put 8" boards to both types of tubes though.
|
|
|
|
Post by barclay66 on Apr 28, 2015 6:01:33 GMT -5
Hi,
Mike Parker mentioned that the setting of the over current monitoring (R86) differs between the two board versions...
|
|
|
|
Post by gjaky on Apr 28, 2015 12:16:38 GMT -5
Hi, Mike Parker mentioned that the setting of the over current monitoring (R86) differs between the two board versions... I'm glad you are here  And probably that is the main reason why the different machines are specified at different lumen ratings, eg. if you put 8" neckboards on 9" tubes, the 8" neckboards may limit the beam current earlier than genuine 9" neckboards. Also could be a reason why the keying is preventing the backwards compatibility (not to overdrive the 8" tubes). |
|
